(109) Bularreko minbizi diagnostikoaren ostean, aukera kirurgikoen aurrean erabakiak hartzeko prozesuaren kalitatearen deskribapena.

Laburpena

Bularreko minbiziaren tratamendu kirurgikoen aurrean erabakitze prozesuaren kalitatea deskribatzea da lan honen helburu nagusia. Horretarako, euskal autonomia erkidegoko hiru lurraldeetako emakumeen datuak jaso ziren, guztira 135. Azterketaren aldagai nagusia erabakitze prozesua izanda, Shared Decision Making (SDM-Q-9) eta I-SHARE baliozkotutako galdetegiak erabili ziren. Horietaz gain, euren autopertzepzioa eta profesionalen neutraltasuna ezagutzeko, ad-hoc galderak erabili ziren. Partehartzaileen ezaugarri sozioekonomikoak bildu ziren. Emaitzei dagokienez, erabakiaren kalitatearen autopertzepzio baxua erakutsi dute datuek, eta kirurgia motaren arabera prozesua ezberdin baloratzen dela ere. Bularreko minbizi diagnostikoa jasotzen duten emakumeen, eta kirurgia egitea erabakitzen den horretan, hartutako erabakietan eragile ezberdinek duten inplikazioa oraindik gehiago aztertzea beharrezkoa da. The main objective of this study is to describe the decision-making process quality regarding surgical treatments for breast cancer. To achieve this, data were collected from 135 women across the three provinces of the Basque Autonomous Community. The primary variable of analysis was the decision-making process, assessed using the validated Shared Decision Making (SDM-Q-9) and iSHARE questionnaires. Additionally, an ad-hoc question was included to consider participants' self-perception of the quality and professional neutrality. Socioeconomic characteristics of the participants were also recorded. The results indicate a low self-perception of decision quality and suggest that the evaluation of the decision-making process varies depending on the type of surgery. The findings highlight the need for further research into the involvement of key actors in the decision-making process of women facing breast cancer surgery.